Top 5 Difference between Manual and Automated Mobile Testing

Many industries today have adopted mobile or web-based applications into their daily business tasks. We cannot imagine anyone without a mobile or a system. Everyone has adopted the digitization concept, and as a result, the demand for mobile and web-based applications is increasing. With the increase in demand, there is an expectation from the user that the app should perform the way they like. As a result, we must emphasize providing complex features with outstanding functioning to end-users. Mobile Testing is one of the most important factors that must be addressed in order for this to happen.

Testing provides numerous advantages, like increasing the app’s performance and removing bugs from the app’s functionalities. As a result, mobile testing is an essential component of the app development process that must not be overlooked.

Manual testing and automated testing are the two primary mobile app methodologies; this is where most people get confused. In this blog, let us walk through the top 5 key differences between manual and automated mobile testing:

Top 5 Difference between Manual and Automated Mobile Testing

Meaning of Manual and Automated Testing: Manual mobile testing tests the different types of applications manually without the interference of any automated technique or tool. In manual testing, the tester can see and feel how the application is functioning. Manual testing is essential for the application’s user interface (UI), which includes icons, buttons, dialogue boxes, color, typefaces, and other screen elements.
Automated testing is usually done with the help of a tool where there is less or no manual interference. Testers create test scripts and validate software using appropriate automation technologies. The goal is to finish testing in a shorter amount of time.

Costing Methodology and Investment: In manual testing, the cost is incurred on the human resources deploying the test, and in the case of automated testing, the price has to be incurred on the testing tools. In automated mobile testing, the tester must understand how the tool works and then generate test cases based on that.

Testing Framework: To speed up the automation process, frameworks like Data Drive, Keyword, and Hybrid are used. Manual testing does not employ frameworks, but it does use standards, checklists, and rigorous methods to create test cases.

Determining the user-friendliness: Human consideration is not taken into account in automated testing. Manual testing allows for human observation, which could be beneficial in developing a user-friendly system. But the drawback in manual mobile testing is that it does not document the test results, or instead, test results are not readily available. As a result, it can never guarantee user-friendliness or an outstanding client experience.
Reliability: Manual testing takes a lot of processing time and is still prone to human errors, whereas automated testing is fast and reliable. Automated testing does not involve human interaction and is anyday more reliable.

Conclusion: According to research experience, picking one strategy and sticking with it for the rest of your life is not a good idea because various projects demand different testing approaches. Other areas on which you should implement your test use cases include system testing and performance testing.

Both manual and automated testing have advantages and disadvantages, so consider the aspects of your project before deciding on a testing strategy for your mobile app. Your goal should be to provide high-quality work that meets your deadline and budget.